Royal Dutch Shell Plc Financial Analysis

Royal Dutch Shell Plc Financial Analysis I. INTRODUCTION a. Topic Chosen and its context In this Research and Analysis project Report, I will be analyzing the financial performance of Royal Dutch Shell Plc. I will be identifying and analyzing the factors effecting the financial position of Royal Dutch Shell plc. The role of non-financial performance indicators which effects the financial position of the company will also be kept in mind. I will analyze the financial position of the company compared to its performance with previous years, with the industry and with its rival (BP). The word Shell will be used in place of Royal Dutch Shell as it is convenient. I will base my comparison on figures of audited annual accounts for the last 3 years. Financial analysis is an effective way of analyzing companys performance. Ratio Analysis is the technique, which will mainly be used for financial analysis. My analysis will also be based upon the comparison of key ratios with main rival of Shell, which will indicate some of the core strategies in seeking a competitive position to achieve its purposes. I will use Life Cycle model to analyze my findings on those markets, which materially contribute towards the companys financial results. Then I will use PEST analysis to analyze different stages identified and nature of Life Cycle. My conclusions will be based on current situation of the company as compared to past years and future expectations using the techniques mentioned above. b. Reasons for selection Reasons for selection of the topic and organization are as follows:  § Wide Information base: Shell, being a public limited company and one of the largest oil and gas concern in the finance sector the availability of timely, relevant, reliable information was an added advantage.  § Relation to my studies: While studying my ACCA, one of the important skills which I have learned is the ability to analyze the financial statements, and such a comprehensive research and analysis project will definitely help in developing the same  § The company: Other reason is the investment prospective and size of the company. The company unveiled the largest expenditure program in its history, spend $36bn in 2008 compared to $25bn last year, as it seeks new sources of oil and gas to boost reserves and production and to better exploit its existing resources. (Ft.com, July2008) Standard Poors, the credit ratings agency, downgraded its long-term rating for BP, the Oil and Gas Company, and upgraded Royal Dutch Shell, BPs closest rival, illustrating the widening perception of the two companys circumstances. SP noted Shells reserves replacement success and said current major projects should sustain its production plateau in the next decade. (Ft.com, September 2008) c. Aims and Objectives The aims and objectives contains the comparison of the financial performance of the petroleum sector to assess the worth of the company in its operational industry .To get an idea about the attitude of the management towards the operations of the company by assessing the companys cash flow position compared to its profits. Also to analyze the risks faces by the company I will take in to account Solvency, Liquidity and Capital structures. d. Research Approach ACCA provides a complete guide about different sections of the report, and also this provides the opportunity to plan and think to allocate my time carefully. This planning will help me to concentrate on each section of the report so that I can focus on core and important areas of the report. This also enables me not to overspend my time in explaining any section of the report. Information mainly collected from annual reports of the company and also different sort of other sources like ACCA text books, internet, newspaper, library etc. Traditional ratio analysis has been used to measure and compare the financial performance of the company over last 3 years with its rivals. Ratio analysis will focus on the following key ratios:  § Profitability Ratios This ratio is the reflection of how well the business is performing in term of profits in order to pay the shareholders. Key ratios are: a. Gross Profit Margin b. Operating Profit Margin c. Return on Average Capital Employed  § Liquidity Ratios Liquidity ratio refers to the state of an assets nearness to cash to meet business short term obligations as they fell due. Key ratios a. Current Ratio b. Quick ratio (Acid Test Ratio)  § Efficiency Ratios These ratios show how efficiently the business is employing those resources invested in fixed assets and working capital. Ratios are: a. Debtor Days b. Creditor Days  § Risk Ratios These ratios are used to assess how healthy and sound the business is in term of capital or finances. Ratios are a. Gearing Ratio b. Interest Cover  § Investors Ratios Both present and prospective shareholders look at these ratios to measure their return and to make economic decisions. Key ratios are a. Earnings per Share b. Diluted Earnings per Share II. INFORMATION GATHERING a. Sources of Information Used The information has been collected from different secondary sources for the preparation of this project. Main secondary sources which are use to gather information is as follows:  § Annual Accounts: The annual audited accounts of Shell are the main secondary source of information to use in this project. These annual audited accounts were available from stock exchange. As it supposed to be accurate and reliable thus provides me with an ideal source of annual accounts of the company. I have used only the audited annual accounts for the last three years of the company though unaudited quarterly review until July was available, to make certain that only reliable and accurate source of information is used in my research and analysis project. These audited annual accounts provides me all the information for the last three years which is essential in computing key financial ratios and also to make a comparison with rivals and industry averages of the company. Annual accounts of the rivals for the last three years are also used to make comparison with the Shell.  § Financial Analysts Report: They are professional people and their views are independent and their analysis helped the shareholders making economic decisions, which in turns affects the very existence of the company.  § Kaplans Tutorial Text: Kaplans tutorial text for Bsc (Hons) in Applied Accounting also helped me a lot for gathering information and also about the different requirements of the reports. It also helped in focusing a particular section of the report and also helped in overall design of the project so that nothing is missing in the project.  § News Papers: Getting in touch with the business section of leading newspapers like The Times, The Independent, Daily Express and The Telegraph was very useful as it provided me guidance on the economy overall and as well the movement in the share prices of different companies. b. Methods Used To Collect Information To collect information various methods are used like,  § Internet: Internet offers a speedy and impersonal way of getting to know the basics of the services that a company provides. (BPP 2005 Paper 3.4) I visited www.shell.com to access the financial reports of the company and press releases. I also visited www.bp.com to get information about the rival company of Shell for the purpose of comparison. Also I visited www.ft.com which really helped me a lot for the up to date information about the Shell and BP. I have also visited www.wikipedia.org to get information which helped me a lot to understand the oil and gas industry. In addition I visited the www.bbc.co.uk to get the latest news and important interviews.  § Use of the E-mail: For communication with Shell people I use to e-mail them during my research whenever I want to get some important information. They responded quickly to answer my query.  § Library Research: Libraries proved quite helpful so some libraries in London, Kaplan Financial College library and City Business Library in Moorgate London for general reading of the newspapers, journals, different books, magazines to get important information about Shell and BP. I spend most of my time in city business library, where I was able to get specific information through different CD ROMS which included different databases search designed specifically for getting information about different companies. Some of the CD ROMs are:  § Financial Analysis Made Easy: This database provided the detailed key financial data in the form of profit and loss accounts and the balance sheet. Also it helped me to get important ratios of the Shell and BP and their comparison with the preceding years in the form of graphs.  § Marketing and Business Information Centre (Data Monitor): This database provided vital information regarding the company, industry and market news for the research and analysis. This database contains records of hundreds of companies in UK and worldwide. When I looked at the Shell data, it really helped me by providing the overview and the detailed information. Then same thing was true for its rival BP. c. Limitations in the Information Gathering A number of difficulties I have faced sometime in getting the required information. For instance, I was expecting to get more information from the newspaper, but actually it was not. The newspaper only provides information about a particular date and some events but in depth information cannot be obtained and also articles are found in different newspaper i.e. nothing is new than others. Similarly when I went to City library, I was not aware of using FAME database, so when I tried to get information from database it took me too long. Moreover it only provides me the financial data in the form of graphs. Another problem which I have faced is the information overload on the internet. Whenever I tried to search something on the net it gives me too many results which some time confused me which information I should use and which is not. d. Accounting Technique Used and Limitations In this report to analyze the financial performance of Shell comparing to BP ratio analysis has been used. Ratios are important tool in analyzing the financial performance of the company. Ratios are used because shareholders and potential investors are primarily concerned with receiving an adequate return on their investment. An earnings per share is a key ratio that is to be used to determine the returns on shareholders fund. Suppliers and lenders are concerned with the security of their debt or loan. So they are mainly focused on the gearing level the company is having and also the interest cover. More over management is concerned with the trend and level of profits, so ratios are the main measure of the success. Furthermore, managements bonuses are linked to the profits of the company. I have calculated the key ratios in an appendix from 2006-2008 for Shell and BP and they did analyze the results. Ratios were used as a tool to assist analysis and to focus attention systematically on important areas. Ratios summarize information in an understandable form and also helped me to identify trends and relationships. There are also limitations of financial statements and ratio analysis as they are based on the past and ratios are not predictive if they are based on historical information. Ratios ignores any future action which is or to be taken by management. Another limitation faced by ratio analysis is the fact that the ratios results may be distorted if there are differences in the accounting policies. (Kaplan Financial Study Text Paper F7) In all, Ratios have limitations but are still regarded as the best tool for analyzing the financial performance of the business and so I also used it. III. ANALYSIS In this section of the report I will explain and analyze the financial performance of Shell and will compare its results with BP.I will also explain Shells financial position in the current year. a. Company History: The Royal Dutch Shell Group was created in February 1907 when the Royal Dutch Petroleum Company and the Shell Transport and Trading Company Ltd of theUnited Kingdommerged their operations. This move was largely driven by the need to compete globally with the predominant American oil company (www.wikipedia.org) b. Financial Analysis: Here is the analysis of the financial data of Shell (Revenue, GP and NP) over the last three years.  § The revenues in 2008 were ($458.4 billion) 28.8% higher than in 2007, when they were ($355.8 billion) 11.6% higher than in 2006. (Appendix)  § The oil and gas prices was One of the main reasons of increase in revenues in 2008  § Brent crude oil prices average $97.14 per barrel in 2008 compared with $72.45 in 2007, while West Texas Intermediate average $99.72 per barrel compared with $72.16 a year earlier. Oil prices saw great fluctuation in 2008. (Annual Report Shell 2008)  § A 6% increase in Gross Profit of Shell in year 2008 and 2007 as compared to gross profit in year. (Appendix)  § Its shows an increase in production costs in line with increase in revenues on high margin products.  § Earnings ($26.5 billion) were lower by 17% in 2008 compared to 2007, when they were ($31.9 billion) 21% higher than in 2006 ($26.3 billion). (Appendix) The decrease in 2008, compared with 2007, reflected the effect of declining oil prices on inventory in the second half of the year, lower production volumes, lower realised refining margins and higher operating costs. These more than offset the positive impact on earnings from higher realised oil and gas prices as well as higher LNG and GTL product prices. (Annual Report Shell 2008) Second quarter 2009 reported earnings were $3,822 million compared to earnings of $11,556 million in the same quarter a year ago. (2nd quarter results 2009, www.shell.com )  § Earnings By Business Segments : All figures in this table are in $million The table shows that earnings in 2008 were higher by 47% in Exploration Production, Gas Power and Oil Sands segments as compare to 2007. On other hand earnings were lower by 100% in 2008 as compare to 2007 in Oil Products, Chemicals and Corporate segments. This 100% reduction in last three segments causes overall reduction of earning in 2008. In the Second quarter Exploration Production segment earnings were $1,334 million compared to $5,881 million a year ago. Earnings compared to the second quarter 2008 reflected the impact of significantly lower oil and gas prices on revenues, lower oil and gas production volumes, higher exploration expenses and non-cash pension charges, which were partly offset by lower royalty and tax expenses. (2nd quarter results 2009, www.shell.com ) Comparison of Shell with BP  § Revenue Growth: Shell and BP revenue over the last three years is shown in the graph: Growth in Revenue in $ Million Shell and BP revenue showed a consistent growth over a period of 3 years. In 2008 Shell revenue 26.9% higher than BP. Which shows that Shell growing consistently as Shell revenue were higher 25.2% 19.9% from BP in 2007 2006 respectively. (Appendix) a. Profitability Ratios The profitability of a company is important and a key measure of its success. The figures shown in the profit and loss account mean very little themselves. However, by expressing them as a percentage of sales they become much more useful. The figures can then be compared with previous years or with other similar companies. (Student Accountant ACCA Magazine, Christopher, 1999.) Gross Profit Margin: Gross profit margin shows earning on sales of a company. In the 2nd quarter of 2009 the gross profit margin has fallen 62% compared to last years 2nd quarter results. An indication of high profit margin is that the company earned well on sales by keeping overhead cost in control. Gross profit margin of 2008 is lower than previous years. Net Profit: Shell net profit margin dropped by 3.2% to 5.8% in 2008 from 9% in 2007. And margin in 2006 was 8.3%.BP net profit margin dropped by 1.5% to 5.9% in 2008 from 7.4% in 2007. The 2006 margin was 8.4%. (Appendix) Growth in Net Profit Shell and BP (%) The profit margin is mainly used as an internal comparison tool. As there are different levels of expenditure involved it is therefore sometimes difficult to accurately compare the net profit ratio for different entities. As compared to BP Shells net profit margin dropped by a higher percentage in 2008.On the other hand if we see the year 2007 the Shell profits are higher than the BP. Return on Average Capital Employed: ROACE reflects the ability of the company to utilize the resources i.e. capital in generating revenue. Capital employed consists of total equity, currant debt and non-current debts. The published segment level contains the computation and calculation of the tax rate and the minority interest components. The strong income generation is the only reason for change in ROACE from18% to 24% between 2006 and 2008. There is a significant decrease in the capital employed from 24% to 18% in 2008 as compare to 2007. A significant decrease in income attributable to shareholders is partly offset by an increase in capital employed, resulted in a decrease in ROACE of 6.0% in 2008(18%) compared to 2007 (24%). The 2006 figure was 23%. (Appendix and Annual Report Shell 2008) ROACE is defined as the sum of the current and previous three quarters income adjusted for interest expense, after tax, divided by the average capital employed for the period. In the 2nd quarter or 2009 the ROAC stands at 8.3% way below the 25.8% in the 2nd quarter of 2008. (2nd quarter results 2009, www.shell.com ) On the other hand BP utilization of its capital resources was showing a sorry picture. BP ROCE has moved in a range of 16% to 19% between 2006 and 2008. BPs ROCE was 19% in 2006, and then reduced to 16% in 2007, followed by an increase of 1% to stand at 17%. This was due to lower income attributable to shareholders in 3 years time. This increase in 2008 was due to some increase in income attributable to shareholders. (Appendix) ROCE Shell and BP (%) The drop in oil price in the second half of 2008 had a significant impact on earnings. The strengthening of the dollar against other main currencies reduced the impact of Shells investment plans on capital employed. b. Efficiency Ratios Debtor Days Shells receivable days has fallen from 76 days in 2007 to 65 days in 2008. The figure for 2006 was 68 days. This was due to the effective and better controlled credit policy. (Appendix) BP on the other hand, showed increase in its collection to 30 days in 2008 from 49 days in 2007. The 2006 figure stands at 53 days. All this reflected an aggressive and comprehensive credit control policy and ability to collect from customers. (Appendix) Creditors Days The payment to creditors from Shell showed improvement in payment to creditors in 2008 if we compare the figures to last three years. As creditors days reduced to 78 days in 2008 from 93 days in 2007, while the figure in 2006 was 87. This improvement shows that company has liquidity to pay off its debts and also helped in making stronger relationship with creditors, which could be Suppliers, lenders. (Appendix) BPs creditors days showed reduction over a period of 3 years i.e. from 82 days in 2006 to 78 days in 2007 and more improved to 46 days in 2008 which showed a good sign for the company. (Appendix) c. Liquidity Ratios Current Ratio As short-term creditors prefer a high current ratio since it reduces their risk. The current ratio measures the adequacy of current assets to meet the companys short-term liabilities as they fall due. Traditionally, a current ratio of 2:1 or higher was regarded as appropriate for most businesses to maintain creditworthiness. However, more recently a figure of 1.5:1 is regarded as a norm. (Kaplan Financial, Paper F7 Study Text) Current ratio for Shell in 2008 was 1.1 and remained Constant between 2006 and 2007 to stand at 1.2. This shows better position for Shell and its ability to pay short term liabilities as they fall due. (Appendix) BP current ratio was also healthy between 2006 and 2007, but in 2008 the ratio was below 1 which may be not a good sign for short term creditors. But it was ok as for as it remains near to 1. (Appendix) One drawback of the current ratio is that inventory may include many items that are difficult to liquidate quickly and that have uncertain liquidation value. SO the quick ratio is an alternative measure of liquidity that does not include inventory in the current assets. (Paper3.6, BPP Professional Education, June 2007) Quick Ratio The quick ratio also known as the acid test ratio eliminates inventory from the currant assets. It provides the acid test of whether the company has sufficient liquid resources (receivables and cash) to settle its short term liabilities. Normal level for quick ratio ranges from 1:1 to 0.7:1. (Kaplan Financial, Paper F7 Study Text) For Shell, liquidity ratio remained unchanged within the industry standards between 2006 and 2008 to stand at 0.9. This shows the companys ability to pay short liabilities from most liquid resources i.e. receivables and cash not inventory. (Appendix) BPs quick ratio showed a sorry picture and remains unchanged on 0.7 between 2006 and 2008, as it was standing at the danger level of 0.7 meaning that BP is not having enough liquid resources to pay off the liabilities due. (Appendix) d. Risk Ratios Gearing: Gearing is the relationship between the companys fixed return capital and its equity capital. Gearing ratio indicates the degree of risk attached to the company and the sensitivity of earnings and dividends to change in profitability and activity level. High geared businesses uses large proportion of fixed return capital, so there are greater chances of insolvency and ultimately return to shareholders grow proportionately more if profits are growing. While low geared businesses provide scope to increase borrowings when potential profitable projects are available and can usually grow more easily. (Kaplan Financial, Paper F7 Study Text) Gearing levels in (%) (2006-2008) Shell maintained smooth profits and more suitable assets for security in order to make use of gearing successfully. Shells gearing level increased in 2008 due to more debts taken as compared to 2006 and 2007. Gearing was 23% in 2008 compared to 17% in 2007. The gearing ratio was 15% in 2006. The increase was due to rise in the total debt. On the other hand, BP gearing level was also high standing between 36% to 28% with 36% in 2008 compare to 28% in 2006, while 2007 figure was 33%, which is higher than Shell. High level of gearing means high risk to business, but this is compensated by a significant increase in profits and the returns to the shareholders. So Shell can borrow more easily in future. Interest Cover Companys interest cover indicates the ability to pay interest out of profits generated. Low interest cover indicates to the shareholders that their dividends are at risk (because most profits are use to pay interest payments) and the company may have difficulty financing its debts if its profits fall. (Kaplan Financial, Paper F7 Study text) Shells interest cover has decreased to 42 times in 2008 compared to 45 times in 2007. The interest covers for 2006 was 38 times. This shows Shells ability to finance its debts and the ability to pay interest out of the profits for sure. As investors are interested in the risk level the company is in, it is a healthy sign. Interest Cover in Times (2006-2008) For BP, there is an increase of interest cover to 30 times as compare to 29 times in 2007 but in 2007 there is a huge reduction in interest cover to 29 times from 49 times in 2006 which clearly indicates the inability of BP to finance its debt and to pay interest out of profits generated. That makes BP riskier than Shell for investment purposes. e. Investors Ratios Earnings per Share (EPS): Earnings per Share for Shell decreased in 2008 from $5 in 2007 to $4.27 in 2008. This was due to decline in profits followed by the repurchase of the shares, which causes a net decrease of 105 million in the number of ordinary shares outstanding as a result of share buybacks. As widespread the use of the EPS as a yardstick for investment decisions. Share price of company might fall if it looks as if EPS is going to be low. EPS increased to $5 in 2007 compared to $3.97 in 2006, this was due to decrease in the number of ordinary shares in 2007 as company repurchased its 112 million shares of common stock for cancellation at a gross cost of $4.4billion.this purchase reduced the number of shares outstanding to 1.7% in 2007 and by 7.3% in total since the commencement of share repurchases following the unification into Royal Dutch Shell and successful completion of Royal Dutch Minority tender (August 2005). (Annual Report Shell 2008) In the first six months of 2009 the EPS for Shell is $1.19 compared to the six month figure of $3.34 of the same period of 2009 (2nd quarter results 2009, www.shell.com ) Earnings Per Share in $ (2006-2008) BPs Basic Earnings per Share increased in 2008 to $1.13 from $1.09 in 2007. This was due to the appreciation in the profits followed by the repurchase of shares, which causes a net decrease of 373 million in the number o shares. Basic EPS decline by 0.01 to stands at $1.09 in 2007 compared to $1.10 in 2006. This was due to the declining of profits of BP. (BP Annual Report 2008) Diluted Earnings per Share(DEPS) : Diluted Earnings Per Share attempts to alert the shareholders to the potential impact on the Earnings per Share due to change in equity share capital in future owing to circumstances which exist now-known as dilution. The most common type of dilution is an option or warrant which gives the holder right to buy shares at time in future at predetermined price. (Kaplan Financial, Paper F7 Study Text) Diluted Earnings Per Share in $ (2006-2008) Shells DEPS reduced due to the reduction in the profits and number of shares to $4.26 in 2008 compared to $4.99 in 2007, while it was $3.95 in 2006. BPs DEPS increased to $1.12 in 2008 from $1.08 in 2007. The figure was $1.09 in 2006. The main reason for this was increase in profits despite shares in numbers was reduced. (Appendix) f. Cash Flow Statement: Shells cash flow from operating activities has increased by 27% reaching a record level of $43.9 billion in 2008 compared with $34.5 billion in 2007 and $31.7 billion in 2006. This improvement in cash flow from operations was a result of reduces working capital in 2008 compared to 2007. The increase in the operating activity in 2007 mainly because of increase in income as well as a reduction in taxation paid in 2007 compared to 2006. In 2009, Shells cash flow from operating activities reduced in the first two quarters to stands at $8478 million compared to $21,030 million in the same period of 2008. (2nd quarter results 2009, www.shell.com ) BPs cash flow from operation declined to $24.7 billion in 2007 compared to $28.2 billion in 2006, but the cash from operating activity increased in 2008. This is menially because of increase in income. (BP Annual Report 2008) Higher capital expenditure in 2008 compared to 2007 made Shell to use its Cash flow in investing activities i.e. $28.9 billion in 2008 compare to $14.6 Billion in 2007. In 2009, Shell continued to invest more with cash flow from investing activities stands at $(13,829) million in six months from $(12,275) million in 2007. (2nd quarter results, www.shell.com) But there was less cash paid out in investing activity in 2007(-14.6 billion) as compare to 2006(-20.9 billion) and the main reason was that the proceeds from sale of asset was higher and les capital expenditure in 2007 as compare to 2006. (Shell Annual Report 2008) BP was also having strong investment with $(22.8) billion in 2008 from $(14.8) billion in 2007. The figure for 2006 was $(9.5) billion. (BP Annual Report 2008) In 2008, as Shell took more debts which results in Shells cash flow from/used in financing activities reduced to $(9.4) billion in 2008 from $(19.4) billion in 2007.As Shell acquired Canada minority interest in 2007 resulting Cash flow from financing activity increased in 2007 from (13.7) billion in 2006. There was a small increase of BPs Net cash flow from/ used in financing activities from (9.0) billion in 2007 to (10.5) billion in 2008 menially because of more dividends paid and less repurchase of shares in 2008. Net cash from financing activities was reduced to $(9.0) billion in 2007 from $(19.0) billion in 2006. (BP Annual Report 2008) Cash and Cash Equivalent of Shell and BP in Billions Cash and Cash equivalent of Shell reached 15.2 billion at the end of 2008, up by 57% as compare to 2007 figure of 9.6 billion. Which is good sign for Shell as there cash and cash equivalent was higher as well in 2007 as compare to 2006 figure of 9.0 billion. BPs cash and cash equivalent also increased to $8.2 billion in 2008 from $3.5 billion in 2007 and also up from 2006 level of $2.5 billion. (Shell and BP Annual Report 2008) This shows that Shell has a sound position and has no problem what so ever in cash flow compared to its rivals. c. Non-Financial Analysis In this section of the report I will be analyzing the corporate social responsibility and the SWOT analysis. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) We recognise that our continuing business success depends on helping to meet the worlds growing energy needs in environmentally and socially responsible ways. To manage todays business risks and deliver our strategy, it is critical that we maintain the trust of a wide range of stakeholders. (Shell Annual Report 2008) Environmental Social performance Greenhouse Gas Emissions In 2008 despite growing business, Shell operated facilities emitted 75 million tons of GHGs, (measured on a CO2 equivalent basis), about 7 million lower than the previous year, and nearly 30% below 1990 levels. (Shell Annual Report 2008) Flaring Since 2001, Exploration Production has reduced its natural gas flaring by more than 70%. In 2008, total flaring in Exploration Production dropped again mostly due to reduces flaring in Malaysia and Gabon, as investment and operational improvement programs showed result. In 2008 flaring levels in Nigeria were same as in 2007. Spills Shell has reduced the amount of oil and oil products spilled from operations for reasons, Shell can control, like corrosion or operational failures. Spills from sabotage or extreme weather, like hurricanes, which are harder to prevent, have fluctuated with events. In 2008 the number and amount spilled for operational reasons dropped Royal Dutch Shell Plc Financial Analysis Royal Dutch Shell Plc Financial Analysis I. INTRODUCTION a. Topic Chosen and its context In this Research and Analysis project Report, I will be analyzing the financial performance of Royal Dutch Shell Plc. I will be identifying and analyzing the factors effecting the financial position of Royal Dutch Shell plc. The role of non-financial performance indicators which effects the financial position of the company will also be kept in mind. I will analyze the financial position of the company compared to its performance with previous years, with the industry and with its rival (BP). The word Shell will be used in place of Royal Dutch Shell as it is convenient. I will base my comparison on figures of audited annual accounts for the last 3 years. Financial analysis is an effective way of analyzing companys performance. Ratio Analysis is the technique, which will mainly be used for financial analysis. My analysis will also be based upon the comparison of key ratios with main rival of Shell, which will indicate some of the core strategies in seeking a competitive position to achieve its purposes. I will use Life Cycle model to analyze my findings on those markets, which materially contribute towards the companys financial results. Then I will use PEST analysis to analyze different stages identified and nature of Life Cycle. My conclusions will be based on current situation of the company as compared to past years and future expectations using the techniques mentioned above. b. Reasons for selection Reasons for selection of the topic and organization are as follows:  § Wide Information base: Shell, being a public limited company and one of the largest oil and gas concern in the finance sector the availability of timely, relevant, reliable information was an added advantage.  § Relation to my studies: While studying my ACCA, one of the important skills which I have learned is the ability to analyze the financial statements, and such a comprehensive research and analysis project will definitely help in developing the same  § The company: Other reason is the investment prospective and size of the company. The company unveiled the largest expenditure program in its history, spend $36bn in 2008 compared to $25bn last year, as it seeks new sources of oil and gas to boost reserves and production and to better exploit its existing resources. (Ft.com, July2008) Standard Poors, the credit ratings agency, downgraded its long-term rating for BP, the Oil and Gas Company, and upgraded Royal Dutch Shell, BPs closest rival, illustrating the widening perception of the two companys circumstances. SP noted Shells reserves replacement success and said current major projects should sustain its production plateau in the next decade. (Ft.com, September 2008) c. Aims and Objectives The aims and objectives contains the comparison of the financial performance of the petroleum sector to assess the worth of the company in its operational industry .To get an idea about the attitude of the management towards the operations of the company by assessing the companys cash flow position compared to its profits. Also to analyze the risks faces by the company I will take in to account Solvency, Liquidity and Capital structures. d. Research Approach ACCA provides a complete guide about different sections of the report, and also this provides the opportunity to plan and think to allocate my time carefully. This planning will help me to concentrate on each section of the report so that I can focus on core and important areas of the report. This also enables me not to overspend my time in explaining any section of the report. Information mainly collected from annual reports of the company and also different sort of other sources like ACCA text books, internet, newspaper, library etc. Traditional ratio analysis has been used to measure and compare the financial performance of the company over last 3 years with its rivals. Ratio analysis will focus on the following key ratios:  § Profitability Ratios This ratio is the reflection of how well the business is performing in term of profits in order to pay the shareholders. Key ratios are: a. Gross Profit Margin b. Operating Profit Margin c. Return on Average Capital Employed  § Liquidity Ratios Liquidity ratio refers to the state of an assets nearness to cash to meet business short term obligations as they fell due. Key ratios a. Current Ratio b. Quick ratio (Acid Test Ratio)  § Efficiency Ratios These ratios show how efficiently the business is employing those resources invested in fixed assets and working capital. Ratios are: a. Debtor Days b. Creditor Days  § Risk Ratios These ratios are used to assess how healthy and sound the business is in term of capital or finances. Ratios are a. Gearing Ratio b. Interest Cover  § Investors Ratios Both present and prospective shareholders look at these ratios to measure their return and to make economic decisions. Key ratios are a. Earnings per Share b. Diluted Earnings per Share II. INFORMATION GATHERING a. Sources of Information Used The information has been collected from different secondary sources for the preparation of this project. Main secondary sources which are use to gather information is as follows:  § Annual Accounts: The annual audited accounts of Shell are the main secondary source of information to use in this project. These annual audited accounts were available from stock exchange. As it supposed to be accurate and reliable thus provides me with an ideal source of annual accounts of the company. I have used only the audited annual accounts for the last three years of the company though unaudited quarterly review until July was available, to make certain that only reliable and accurate source of information is used in my research and analysis project. These audited annual accounts provides me all the information for the last three years which is essential in computing key financial ratios and also to make a comparison with rivals and industry averages of the company. Annual accounts of the rivals for the last three years are also used to make comparison with the Shell.  § Financial Analysts Report: They are professional people and their views are independent and their analysis helped the shareholders making economic decisions, which in turns affects the very existence of the company.  § Kaplans Tutorial Text: Kaplans tutorial text for Bsc (Hons) in Applied Accounting also helped me a lot for gathering information and also about the different requirements of the reports. It also helped in focusing a particular section of the report and also helped in overall design of the project so that nothing is missing in the project.  § News Papers: Getting in touch with the business section of leading newspapers like The Times, The Independent, Daily Express and The Telegraph was very useful as it provided me guidance on the economy overall and as well the movement in the share prices of different companies. b. Methods Used To Collect Information To collect information various methods are used like,  § Internet: Internet offers a speedy and impersonal way of getting to know the basics of the services that a company provides. (BPP 2005 Paper 3.4) I visited www.shell.com to access the financial reports of the company and press releases. I also visited www.bp.com to get information about the rival company of Shell for the purpose of comparison. Also I visited www.ft.com which really helped me a lot for the up to date information about the Shell and BP. I have also visited www.wikipedia.org to get information which helped me a lot to understand the oil and gas industry. In addition I visited the www.bbc.co.uk to get the latest news and important interviews.  § Use of the E-mail: For communication with Shell people I use to e-mail them during my research whenever I want to get some important information. They responded quickly to answer my query.  § Library Research: Libraries proved quite helpful so some libraries in London, Kaplan Financial College library and City Business Library in Moorgate London for general reading of the newspapers, journals, different books, magazines to get important information about Shell and BP. I spend most of my time in city business library, where I was able to get specific information through different CD ROMS which included different databases search designed specifically for getting information about different companies. Some of the CD ROMs are:  § Financial Analysis Made Easy: This database provided the detailed key financial data in the form of profit and loss accounts and the balance sheet. Also it helped me to get important ratios of the Shell and BP and their comparison with the preceding years in the form of graphs.  § Marketing and Business Information Centre (Data Monitor): This database provided vital information regarding the company, industry and market news for the research and analysis. This database contains records of hundreds of companies in UK and worldwide. When I looked at the Shell data, it really helped me by providing the overview and the detailed information. Then same thing was true for its rival BP. c. Limitations in the Information Gathering A number of difficulties I have faced sometime in getting the required information. For instance, I was expecting to get more information from the newspaper, but actually it was not. The newspaper only provides information about a particular date and some events but in depth information cannot be obtained and also articles are found in different newspaper i.e. nothing is new than others. Similarly when I went to City library, I was not aware of using FAME database, so when I tried to get information from database it took me too long. Moreover it only provides me the financial data in the form of graphs. Another problem which I have faced is the information overload on the internet. Whenever I tried to search something on the net it gives me too many results which some time confused me which information I should use and which is not. d. Accounting Technique Used and Limitations In this report to analyze the financial performance of Shell comparing to BP ratio analysis has been used. Ratios are important tool in analyzing the financial performance of the company. Ratios are used because shareholders and potential investors are primarily concerned with receiving an adequate return on their investment. An earnings per share is a key ratio that is to be used to determine the returns on shareholders fund. Suppliers and lenders are concerned with the security of their debt or loan. So they are mainly focused on the gearing level the company is having and also the interest cover. More over management is concerned with the trend and level of profits, so ratios are the main measure of the success. Furthermore, managements bonuses are linked to the profits of the company. I have calculated the key ratios in an appendix from 2006-2008 for Shell and BP and they did analyze the results. Ratios were used as a tool to assist analysis and to focus attention systematically on important areas. Ratios summarize information in an understandable form and also helped me to identify trends and relationships. There are also limitations of financial statements and ratio analysis as they are based on the past and ratios are not predictive if they are based on historical information. Ratios ignores any future action which is or to be taken by management. Another limitation faced by ratio analysis is the fact that the ratios results may be distorted if there are differences in the accounting policies. (Kaplan Financial Study Text Paper F7) In all, Ratios have limitations but are still regarded as the best tool for analyzing the financial performance of the business and so I also used it. III. ANALYSIS In this section of the report I will explain and analyze the financial performance of Shell and will compare its results with BP.I will also explain Shells financial position in the current year. a. Company History: The Royal Dutch Shell Group was created in February 1907 when the Royal Dutch Petroleum Company and the Shell Transport and Trading Company Ltd of theUnited Kingdommerged their operations. This move was largely driven by the need to compete globally with the predominant American oil company (www.wikipedia.org) b. Financial Analysis: Here is the analysis of the financial data of Shell (Revenue, GP and NP) over the last three years.  § The revenues in 2008 were ($458.4 billion) 28.8% higher than in 2007, when they were ($355.8 billion) 11.6% higher than in 2006. (Appendix)  § The oil and gas prices was One of the main reasons of increase in revenues in 2008  § Brent crude oil prices average $97.14 per barrel in 2008 compared with $72.45 in 2007, while West Texas Intermediate average $99.72 per barrel compared with $72.16 a year earlier. Oil prices saw great fluctuation in 2008. (Annual Report Shell 2008)  § A 6% increase in Gross Profit of Shell in year 2008 and 2007 as compared to gross profit in year. (Appendix)  § Its shows an increase in production costs in line with increase in revenues on high margin products.  § Earnings ($26.5 billion) were lower by 17% in 2008 compared to 2007, when they were ($31.9 billion) 21% higher than in 2006 ($26.3 billion). (Appendix) The decrease in 2008, compared with 2007, reflected the effect of declining oil prices on inventory in the second half of the year, lower production volumes, lower realised refining margins and higher operating costs. These more than offset the positive impact on earnings from higher realised oil and gas prices as well as higher LNG and GTL product prices. (Annual Report Shell 2008) Second quarter 2009 reported earnings were $3,822 million compared to earnings of $11,556 million in the same quarter a year ago. (2nd quarter results 2009, www.shell.com )  § Earnings By Business Segments : All figures in this table are in $million The table shows that earnings in 2008 were higher by 47% in Exploration Production, Gas Power and Oil Sands segments as compare to 2007. On other hand earnings were lower by 100% in 2008 as compare to 2007 in Oil Products, Chemicals and Corporate segments. This 100% reduction in last three segments causes overall reduction of earning in 2008. In the Second quarter Exploration Production segment earnings were $1,334 million compared to $5,881 million a year ago. Earnings compared to the second quarter 2008 reflected the impact of significantly lower oil and gas prices on revenues, lower oil and gas production volumes, higher exploration expenses and non-cash pension charges, which were partly offset by lower royalty and tax expenses. (2nd quarter results 2009, www.shell.com ) Comparison of Shell with BP  § Revenue Growth: Shell and BP revenue over the last three years is shown in the graph: Growth in Revenue in $ Million Shell and BP revenue showed a consistent growth over a period of 3 years. In 2008 Shell revenue 26.9% higher than BP. Which shows that Shell growing consistently as Shell revenue were higher 25.2% 19.9% from BP in 2007 2006 respectively. (Appendix) a. Profitability Ratios The profitability of a company is important and a key measure of its success. The figures shown in the profit and loss account mean very little themselves. However, by expressing them as a percentage of sales they become much more useful. The figures can then be compared with previous years or with other similar companies. (Student Accountant ACCA Magazine, Christopher, 1999.) Gross Profit Margin: Gross profit margin shows earning on sales of a company. In the 2nd quarter of 2009 the gross profit margin has fallen 62% compared to last years 2nd quarter results. An indication of high profit margin is that the company earned well on sales by keeping overhead cost in control. Gross profit margin of 2008 is lower than previous years. Net Profit: Shell net profit margin dropped by 3.2% to 5.8% in 2008 from 9% in 2007. And margin in 2006 was 8.3%.BP net profit margin dropped by 1.5% to 5.9% in 2008 from 7.4% in 2007. The 2006 margin was 8.4%. (Appendix) Growth in Net Profit Shell and BP (%) The profit margin is mainly used as an internal comparison tool. As there are different levels of expenditure involved it is therefore sometimes difficult to accurately compare the net profit ratio for different entities. As compared to BP Shells net profit margin dropped by a higher percentage in 2008.On the other hand if we see the year 2007 the Shell profits are higher than the BP. Return on Average Capital Employed: ROACE reflects the ability of the company to utilize the resources i.e. capital in generating revenue. Capital employed consists of total equity, currant debt and non-current debts. The published segment level contains the computation and calculation of the tax rate and the minority interest components. The strong income generation is the only reason for change in ROACE from18% to 24% between 2006 and 2008. There is a significant decrease in the capital employed from 24% to 18% in 2008 as compare to 2007. A significant decrease in income attributable to shareholders is partly offset by an increase in capital employed, resulted in a decrease in ROACE of 6.0% in 2008(18%) compared to 2007 (24%). The 2006 figure was 23%. (Appendix and Annual Report Shell 2008) ROACE is defined as the sum of the current and previous three quarters income adjusted for interest expense, after tax, divided by the average capital employed for the period. In the 2nd quarter or 2009 the ROAC stands at 8.3% way below the 25.8% in the 2nd quarter of 2008. (2nd quarter results 2009, www.shell.com ) On the other hand BP utilization of its capital resources was showing a sorry picture. BP ROCE has moved in a range of 16% to 19% between 2006 and 2008. BPs ROCE was 19% in 2006, and then reduced to 16% in 2007, followed by an increase of 1% to stand at 17%. This was due to lower income attributable to shareholders in 3 years time. This increase in 2008 was due to some increase in income attributable to shareholders. (Appendix) ROCE Shell and BP (%) The drop in oil price in the second half of 2008 had a significant impact on earnings. The strengthening of the dollar against other main currencies reduced the impact of Shells investment plans on capital employed. b. Efficiency Ratios Debtor Days Shells receivable days has fallen from 76 days in 2007 to 65 days in 2008. The figure for 2006 was 68 days. This was due to the effective and better controlled credit policy. (Appendix) BP on the other hand, showed increase in its collection to 30 days in 2008 from 49 days in 2007. The 2006 figure stands at 53 days. All this reflected an aggressive and comprehensive credit control policy and ability to collect from customers. (Appendix) Creditors Days The payment to creditors from Shell showed improvement in payment to creditors in 2008 if we compare the figures to last three years. As creditors days reduced to 78 days in 2008 from 93 days in 2007, while the figure in 2006 was 87. This improvement shows that company has liquidity to pay off its debts and also helped in making stronger relationship with creditors, which could be Suppliers, lenders. (Appendix) BPs creditors days showed reduction over a period of 3 years i.e. from 82 days in 2006 to 78 days in 2007 and more improved to 46 days in 2008 which showed a good sign for the company. (Appendix) c. Liquidity Ratios Current Ratio As short-term creditors prefer a high current ratio since it reduces their risk. The current ratio measures the adequacy of current assets to meet the companys short-term liabilities as they fall due. Traditionally, a current ratio of 2:1 or higher was regarded as appropriate for most businesses to maintain creditworthiness. However, more recently a figure of 1.5:1 is regarded as a norm. (Kaplan Financial, Paper F7 Study Text) Current ratio for Shell in 2008 was 1.1 and remained Constant between 2006 and 2007 to stand at 1.2. This shows better position for Shell and its ability to pay short term liabilities as they fall due. (Appendix) BP current ratio was also healthy between 2006 and 2007, but in 2008 the ratio was below 1 which may be not a good sign for short term creditors. But it was ok as for as it remains near to 1. (Appendix) One drawback of the current ratio is that inventory may include many items that are difficult to liquidate quickly and that have uncertain liquidation value. SO the quick ratio is an alternative measure of liquidity that does not include inventory in the current assets. (Paper3.6, BPP Professional Education, June 2007) Quick Ratio The quick ratio also known as the acid test ratio eliminates inventory from the currant assets. It provides the acid test of whether the company has sufficient liquid resources (receivables and cash) to settle its short term liabilities. Normal level for quick ratio ranges from 1:1 to 0.7:1. (Kaplan Financial, Paper F7 Study Text) For Shell, liquidity ratio remained unchanged within the industry standards between 2006 and 2008 to stand at 0.9. This shows the companys ability to pay short liabilities from most liquid resources i.e. receivables and cash not inventory. (Appendix) BPs quick ratio showed a sorry picture and remains unchanged on 0.7 between 2006 and 2008, as it was standing at the danger level of 0.7 meaning that BP is not having enough liquid resources to pay off the liabilities due. (Appendix) d. Risk Ratios Gearing: Gearing is the relationship between the companys fixed return capital and its equity capital. Gearing ratio indicates the degree of risk attached to the company and the sensitivity of earnings and dividends to change in profitability and activity level. High geared businesses uses large proportion of fixed return capital, so there are greater chances of insolvency and ultimately return to shareholders grow proportionately more if profits are growing. While low geared businesses provide scope to increase borrowings when potential profitable projects are available and can usually grow more easily. (Kaplan Financial, Paper F7 Study Text) Gearing levels in (%) (2006-2008) Shell maintained smooth profits and more suitable assets for security in order to make use of gearing successfully. Shells gearing level increased in 2008 due to more debts taken as compared to 2006 and 2007. Gearing was 23% in 2008 compared to 17% in 2007. The gearing ratio was 15% in 2006. The increase was due to rise in the total debt. On the other hand, BP gearing level was also high standing between 36% to 28% with 36% in 2008 compare to 28% in 2006, while 2007 figure was 33%, which is higher than Shell. High level of gearing means high risk to business, but this is compensated by a significant increase in profits and the returns to the shareholders. So Shell can borrow more easily in future. Interest Cover Companys interest cover indicates the ability to pay interest out of profits generated. Low interest cover indicates to the shareholders that their dividends are at risk (because most profits are use to pay interest payments) and the company may have difficulty financing its debts if its profits fall. (Kaplan Financial, Paper F7 Study text) Shells interest cover has decreased to 42 times in 2008 compared to 45 times in 2007. The interest covers for 2006 was 38 times. This shows Shells ability to finance its debts and the ability to pay interest out of the profits for sure. As investors are interested in the risk level the company is in, it is a healthy sign. Interest Cover in Times (2006-2008) For BP, there is an increase of interest cover to 30 times as compare to 29 times in 2007 but in 2007 there is a huge reduction in interest cover to 29 times from 49 times in 2006 which clearly indicates the inability of BP to finance its debt and to pay interest out of profits generated. That makes BP riskier than Shell for investment purposes. e. Investors Ratios Earnings per Share (EPS): Earnings per Share for Shell decreased in 2008 from $5 in 2007 to $4.27 in 2008. This was due to decline in profits followed by the repurchase of the shares, which causes a net decrease of 105 million in the number of ordinary shares outstanding as a result of share buybacks. As widespread the use of the EPS as a yardstick for investment decisions. Share price of company might fall if it looks as if EPS is going to be low. EPS increased to $5 in 2007 compared to $3.97 in 2006, this was due to decrease in the number of ordinary shares in 2007 as company repurchased its 112 million shares of common stock for cancellation at a gross cost of $4.4billion.this purchase reduced the number of shares outstanding to 1.7% in 2007 and by 7.3% in total since the commencement of share repurchases following the unification into Royal Dutch Shell and successful completion of Royal Dutch Minority tender (August 2005). (Annual Report Shell 2008) In the first six months of 2009 the EPS for Shell is $1.19 compared to the six month figure of $3.34 of the same period of 2009 (2nd quarter results 2009, www.shell.com ) Earnings Per Share in $ (2006-2008) BPs Basic Earnings per Share increased in 2008 to $1.13 from $1.09 in 2007. This was due to the appreciation in the profits followed by the repurchase of shares, which causes a net decrease of 373 million in the number o shares. Basic EPS decline by 0.01 to stands at $1.09 in 2007 compared to $1.10 in 2006. This was due to the declining of profits of BP. (BP Annual Report 2008) Diluted Earnings per Share(DEPS) : Diluted Earnings Per Share attempts to alert the shareholders to the potential impact on the Earnings per Share due to change in equity share capital in future owing to circumstances which exist now-known as dilution. The most common type of dilution is an option or warrant which gives the holder right to buy shares at time in future at predetermined price. (Kaplan Financial, Paper F7 Study Text) Diluted Earnings Per Share in $ (2006-2008) Shells DEPS reduced due to the reduction in the profits and number of shares to $4.26 in 2008 compared to $4.99 in 2007, while it was $3.95 in 2006. BPs DEPS increased to $1.12 in 2008 from $1.08 in 2007. The figure was $1.09 in 2006. The main reason for this was increase in profits despite shares in numbers was reduced. (Appendix) f. Cash Flow Statement: Shells cash flow from operating activities has increased by 27% reaching a record level of $43.9 billion in 2008 compared with $34.5 billion in 2007 and $31.7 billion in 2006. This improvement in cash flow from operations was a result of reduces working capital in 2008 compared to 2007. The increase in the operating activity in 2007 mainly because of increase in income as well as a reduction in taxation paid in 2007 compared to 2006. In 2009, Shells cash flow from operating activities reduced in the first two quarters to stands at $8478 million compared to $21,030 million in the same period of 2008. (2nd quarter results 2009, www.shell.com ) BPs cash flow from operation declined to $24.7 billion in 2007 compared to $28.2 billion in 2006, but the cash from operating activity increased in 2008. This is menially because of increase in income. (BP Annual Report 2008) Higher capital expenditure in 2008 compared to 2007 made Shell to use its Cash flow in investing activities i.e. $28.9 billion in 2008 compare to $14.6 Billion in 2007. In 2009, Shell continued to invest more with cash flow from investing activities stands at $(13,829) million in six months from $(12,275) million in 2007. (2nd quarter results, www.shell.com) But there was less cash paid out in investing activity in 2007(-14.6 billion) as compare to 2006(-20.9 billion) and the main reason was that the proceeds from sale of asset was higher and les capital expenditure in 2007 as compare to 2006. (Shell Annual Report 2008) BP was also having strong investment with $(22.8) billion in 2008 from $(14.8) billion in 2007. The figure for 2006 was $(9.5) billion. (BP Annual Report 2008) In 2008, as Shell took more debts which results in Shells cash flow from/used in financing activities reduced to $(9.4) billion in 2008 from $(19.4) billion in 2007.As Shell acquired Canada minority interest in 2007 resulting Cash flow from financing activity increased in 2007 from (13.7) billion in 2006. There was a small increase of BPs Net cash flow from/ used in financing activities from (9.0) billion in 2007 to (10.5) billion in 2008 menially because of more dividends paid and less repurchase of shares in 2008. Net cash from financing activities was reduced to $(9.0) billion in 2007 from $(19.0) billion in 2006. (BP Annual Report 2008) Cash and Cash Equivalent of Shell and BP in Billions Cash and Cash equivalent of Shell reached 15.2 billion at the end of 2008, up by 57% as compare to 2007 figure of 9.6 billion. Which is good sign for Shell as there cash and cash equivalent was higher as well in 2007 as compare to 2006 figure of 9.0 billion. BPs cash and cash equivalent also increased to $8.2 billion in 2008 from $3.5 billion in 2007 and also up from 2006 level of $2.5 billion. (Shell and BP Annual Report 2008) This shows that Shell has a sound position and has no problem what so ever in cash flow compared to its rivals. c. Non-Financial Analysis In this section of the report I will be analyzing the corporate social responsibility and the SWOT analysis. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) We recognise that our continuing business success depends on helping to meet the worlds growing energy needs in environmentally and socially responsible ways. To manage todays business risks and deliver our strategy, it is critical that we maintain the trust of a wide range of stakeholders. (Shell Annual Report 2008) Environmental Social performance Greenhouse Gas Emissions In 2008 despite growing business, Shell operated facilities emitted 75 million tons of GHGs, (measured on a CO2 equivalent basis), about 7 million lower than the previous year, and nearly 30% below 1990 levels. (Shell Annual Report 2008) Flaring Since 2001, Exploration Production has reduced its natural gas flaring by more than 70%. In 2008, total flaring in Exploration Production dropped again mostly due to reduces flaring in Malaysia and Gabon, as investment and operational improvement programs showed result. In 2008 flaring levels in Nigeria were same as in 2007. Spills Shell has reduced the amount of oil and oil products spilled from operations for reasons, Shell can control, like corrosion or operational failures. Spills from sabotage or extreme weather, like hurricanes, which are harder to prevent, have fluctuated with events. In 2008 the number and amount spilled for operational reasons dropped

Racial tensions and problems Essay

Racial tensions and problems are common for multiracial countries. They are unavoidable as wherever there is a mixture of cultures, there always is prejudice. As far as the history is concerned, blacks were the ones to whom the hatred was directed the most. Laissez-faire- the initial policy of the British government towards migration proved to work for country’s disadvantage, which only became clear in the years that followed. Negroes, Indians, Asians or any other ethnic minority whose skin color is darker than that of WASP (White Anglo-Saxon Protestants) are referred to as black. For these people the term â€Å"equality of opportunity† is far from the truth and their struggle for â€Å"freedom† seems to be endless. They experience many humiliations on everyday basis and often are objects of bullying. They find it difficult to assimilate owing to many reasons and the society is not helping them at all. However, in accordance with some claims, there exist certain opportunities that these people may take an advantage of. The children of black families are said to be the ones that can make the most of the two cultures- the native and the target one. Owing to their susceptibility, it is easier for them to assimilate than for their parents who have a strong feeling of identity and are often nostalgic about their origin. Mixed schools are places where black children learn about the target culture and socialize with their friends of different origins. It is an opportunity for them to enrich their cultural values and at the same time preserve their own. Due to the disrespectful attitude they meet with everyday, these children become much more motivated to do well at school than their peers. It is education that is inculcated into their mind since it is essential to lead a decent and respectful life in future. On the other hand, schools are often places of terror for black students. In fact, they are bullied and intimidated on every occasion. There are many racist groups including skinheads, whose ideologies are close to that of Nazis. â€Å"The skinheads beat the Bengalis with baseball bats and bottles  and drove at them in a van. One Asian was beaten unconscious  as the mob returned for a second assault just minutes  after the first one. When police searched their van they found  a swastika flag, white supremascist literature as well as machete,  axe, knives and a CS cannister.† (‘Asian Weekly’ 12 July 1993) Blacks are considered as enemies or plague of the country and these subgroups refer to themselves as the cure. Their severe attacks most often have fatal effects or even result in suicides. The victims are innocent adolescents whose only crime seems to be their complexion. Strange as it may seem, elocution and clothing can contribute a lot to an improvement of ones image and status. There are numerous blacks who became successful on television or in politics and many other walks of life. These people surely do not consider themselves different from their parents or ancestors; neither do they consider themselves better. It is hard work that has got them so far and they have every right to be proud of themselves. This may be regarded as the very last step of acculturation where a person is fully assimilated and integrated into the target culture. At this stage one may say that the opportunities for blacks become almost equal with those of WASP. People seeing a black man on television reading news no longer see a black speaker but a speaker who happens to be black and that is a grave difference. It can be safely said that speech manner and impeccable appearance combined with good education opens a window of opportunities for blacks, however, not many of them are willing to accept this chance. â€Å"The fact that many black teenagers dress in the style  of extremist groups, such as the rap group Public Enemy,  conjures up images of hostility and aggression in some people’s  minds. Rightly or wrongly, they will be equated with the attitudes  that such groups represent.† (‘The Sunday Times’ 30 August 1992) Making an effort to assimilate is crucial. Most of young blacks do exactly the opposite. Their appearance and offensive language stray too far from the established norms that exist in a given society. By doing that they exhibit a very negative attitude toward life, which is portrayed not as a desire to assimilate but the converse. Because of the facts presented above only a small percentage of blacks gains respect and a good position in life. This gave rise to something which was termed an â€Å"affirmative action†. All it meant was that employers, to some extent, were forced to give job to people from ethnic minorities. In every institution there must have been a certain percentage of these people employed in order to create a general feeling of equality. Positive as it may seem, this also created problems. It was a â€Å"backstab† for people of the target culture because their jobs were threatened. General attitude was that blacks are given the jobs of whites who are often better skilled to do them. Considering an assembly-line job it did not matter much but a police force was more serious issue. Blacks were teamed with whites to patrol the streets not because their abilities or test scores were high but because they were black and that was an outrage. The society was very negative toward the idea of affirmative action and remained so until today. All in all, I would venture to say that the parents are the ones to be blamed for the problems that their children have with assimilation. It is often their attitude and the feeling of nostalgia that does not allow the youngsters to adopt the target culture. The children are left confused and undergo an identity crisis trying to reconcile themselves to a particular culture. This is where all the problems result from and they seem to outweigh the opportunities that I presented above. Yet, the hope for better future is still at hand. Next generations of blacks will certainly analyze the faults their parents and grandparents had made and allow more freedom of choice for their children. REFERENCES ‘Skinhead mob jailed for attack on Asians’ in â€Å"Asian Weekly† (12th July 1993) ‘Young, gifted and not-too-black’ in â€Å"The Sunday Times† (30th August 1992) BIBLIOGRAPHY Fiedler, E., Jansen, R. and M. Norman-Risch., 1995. America in close-up. Harlow, Longman. O’Driscoll, J., 1995. Britain. Oxford, OUP. ‘Growing up BLACK in Britain’ in â€Å"She† (January 1991) ‘My parents are racist’ in â€Å"Just Seventeen† (1st June 1994) ‘Skinhead mob jailed for attack on Asians’ in â€Å"Asian Weekly† (12th July 1993) ‘When Asian youths hit back’ in â€Å"The Guardian† (16th september 1993) ‘Young, gifted and not-too-black’ in â€Å"The Sunday Times† (30th August 1992)

Pirates: Piracy and Golden Age

Josh Davis FYE 102 Paper 1 9/28/2012 Golden Age Pirates vs. Modern Day Pirates Piracy has been around before the time of the pyramids. Once merchant ship began to deliver goods to other countries, others realized the financial gain that could be made by stealing those goods and selling them themselves. Pirates have ruled the seas at different times. Once Europeans settled in the American colonies, pirates plundered towns along the coast and attacked almost every ship they came in contact with. During the 18th century, wars gave rise to privateering; a legal form of piracy.But, after the War of 1812, this was no longer tolerated. Government put an end to most piracy but, today there are still pirates. By comparing the pirates of the Golden Age with the pirates we have today, we can gain knowledge of how piracy has evolved and changed. Execution was and still is an honored method of dealing with pirates. Merchant ships have always found themselves victim to pirates. In November 1998, p irates hijacked a ship off the Chinese coast. Its name was the Cheung Son. After binding and gagging all the crew members, the pirates killed them and threw their bodies overboard.This ship and its cargo were never seen again. Police eventually discovered pictures of pirates celebrating onboard the Cheung Son. They arrested all thirty-eight pirates. A court found all guilty. Thirteen were sentenced to death, one to life in prison, and the rest were sentenced to twelve years. During the Golden Age, many pirates were hung or executed in some way. After Captain William Kid was hung, his body was tarred and placed in an iron cage. The government put it on display as a warning to other pirates. Likewise, another pirate, named Edward Teach, had his decapitated head put on display as a warning also.Punishment was and is a rarity for pirates. Often, pirates escape with their â€Å"treasure†. Golden Age pirates and Modern day pirates share three requirements to flourish. Both need a p lace to sail where the rewards are substantial. During the Golden Age, the only way to transport goods was by ship. This gave pirates access to an unlimited amount of goods and treasures. Today, small high-speed vessels can easily catch up to larger vessels. The plunder is equally rewarding, but easier to convert into cash. Both generations of pirates need hunting grounds where the risk of detection is small.Golden Age pirates patrolled near Africa, the American and European coast, and as far north as the Caribbean. Today’s pirates thrive off the coasts of Africa and South China. Finally, they both need a safe haven. Port Royal offered a safe place for Golden Age pirates to stay. Many of Indonesia’s islands provide a safe haven for today’s pirates. Weaponry and Technology are very different today than three hundred years ago. Swords and muskets were the weapons of choice for Golden Age pirates. Today, pirates wield automatic rifles and modern communication techn ology.Past pirates used wooden ships with large crews and used cannons to defend their ships. Today’s pirates used small fast boats with small crews. Golden Age pirates attacked any ship that crossed their path, â€Å"crime of opportunity†. Today’s pirates plan their attacks and select victims before they even leave shore. â€Å"The truth is that modern piracy is a violent, bloody, ruthless practice†¦ made the more fearsome by the knowledge on the part of the victims that they are on their own and absolutely defenseless and that no help is waiting round the corner† Captain Jayant Abhyankar, Deputy Director of the International Maritime Bureau 1999.This statement still held true during the Golden Age. Efforts to end piracy began during ancient times. This Island of Rhodes was the first to include piracy in their maritime laws. In the Golden Age almost every nation had established maritime laws. Sir Charles Hedges, a judge of the British Admiralty Cour t during the late 1600’s, says â€Å"pirates are thieves who seize a ship and/or its cargo through violent means upon the sea†. Despite many legal attempts to stop piracy an international definition of piracy did not exist till 1958.Article 15, 1958 Geneva Convention of the High Seas and Article 101, 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea defines piracy as â€Å"a violent seizure on the high seas of a private ship or the illegal detainment of persons property aboard said ship for the purpose of private gain, nor can a government commit an act of piracy†. Piracy in the Golden Age devastated the trade economy. Hundreds of ships carrying numerous amounts of goods were plundered. Today, piracy hardly dents the two trillion dollar a year shipping industry. In 1997 losses amounted to â€Å"$. 32 for every $10,000† J.Gottschalk. This leaves little financial incentive for companies to deal with the problem. Violence was and is still very common amongst pirates. No one knows for sure show many people were murdered by Golden Age Pirates but, its number was staggering. Modern day pirates have left a dent themselves. During a five year period the UN High Commissioner said that an estimated 2,283 women were raped and 592 people were kidnaped. This was in Vietnamese alone. In 2000 there were 182 ships that were attacked. Almost half were in the South China Seas according to the Worldwide Maritime Piracy.Captain Abhyankar wrote in An overview of Piracy Problems; â€Å"A total of 202 incidents were reported in 1998. The majority of these attacks were violent. At least 79 persons have been killed and 35 injured during piracy†. Clearly piracy is still a problem. Piracy is as much of a problem today as it was years ago. Pirates of the golden age and pirates of today are more similar than not, but, they do have differences. We have seen that pirates need three common requirements to thrive and their differences in weapons and technology.Piracy has been around for too long and needs to end. Work Cited Abidi, Shahkar. â€Å"Piracy puts trade in choppy waters,† DNA 12 April 2012 Baldwin, James. â€Å"Dodging Pirates in Southeast Asia,† SailNet, 1 March 2002 â€Å"Drop in Piracy Incidents,† Portsworld. com Malaysia, 25 July 2005 Ellis, Eric. â€Å"Singapore’s New Straits: Piracy on the High Seas is on the Rise in Southeast Asia,† Fortune International (Asia Edition), 148:6 (29 September 2003), p. 24 www. cindyvallar. com. â€Å"Pirates and Privateers the History of Maritime Piracy†, 2006

Pablo Picasso Painter, Playwrite, Sculptor, Printmaker, Ceramicist and an Stage Designer - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 5 Words: 1356 Downloads: 10 Date added: 2019/08/05 Category People Essay Level High school Tags: Pablo Picasso Essay Did you like this example? Pablo Picasso was one of the most influential artists, who applied a diverse range of styles in his artwork throughout his career. One of the most innovative was the Cubist Movement, attributed to Picasso and George Braque, is where subjects or objects are broken into pieces and then put back together in an abstract form. Pablo Picasso was born in Malaga, Spain on October 25, 1881. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Pablo Picasso: Painter, Playwrite, Sculptor, Printmaker, Ceramicist and an Stage Designer" essay for you Create order Picasso’s parents were Josà © Ruiz y Blasco and Marà ­a Picasso y Là ³pez and he had three sisters. Their names were Conchita Picasso and Lola Picasso. Conchita died in 1895 from diphtheria when she was seven and it traumatized Picasso. Picasso’s father, Josà © Ruiz y Blasco, was an artist and professor at the School of Fine Arts. His mother, Marà ­a Picasso y Là ³pez, was an artist as well. In 1891, Picasso being ten years old, the family moved to A Coruà ±a where The School of Fine Arts hired Ruiz to be a professor (Greenfield, Howard. Pablo Picasso: An introduction. Follett, 1971). They spent four years there where Ruiz felt his son surpassed him as an artist at the age of thirteen and reportedly vowed to give up painting (https://www.pablopicasso.org). Picasso graduated from Real Academia de Bellas Artes de San Fernando in Madrid, Spain. After graduating, he moved to Paris, France. While he was in Paris he went through his Blue Period. The Blue Period of Picasso is the period between 1900 and 1904, when he painted pictures usually using blues and greens, sometimes using warm colors. An example of this is the painting, The Old Guitarist. Some paintings from his Blue Period are his most famous pictures, although he had difficulty selling them at the time. Picasso had spent a few difficult years with no fixed studio and little artistic success. Many experts feel that the work he had produced during his Blue Period, seemed to reflect his experience of relative poverty (https://www.pablopicasso.org/blue-period.jsp). After Picasso’s Blue Period was his Rose period in 1904. The Rose Period was about love, joy, and romance. This was also one of Picasso’s brighter periods. In 1904, Picasso met Fernande Olivier, a French artist, and model who became his muse and mistress. Olivier is credited for partially inspiring Picasso’s artistic transition from the cold, somber tone of the Blue Period to the increased warmth and lightness of the Rose Period (https:www.masterworksfineart.com/artists/pablo-picasso/rose-period). With his Rose Period, Picasso favored a lighter and warmer choice of colors. He chose subtle, idealized forms, and more cheerful subjects, such as circus performers. Picasso became fascinated with the fairground and circus performers and began to convey these saltimbanques and harlequins within his works. Picasso observed the saltimbanques firsthand at the Cirque Medrano and in the streets and the outskirts of Paris, where a migrant community of acrobats, musicians, and clowns often entertained passing spectators(https://www.masterworksfineart.com/artists/pablo-picasso/rose-period). In 1917, Pablo Picasso joined the Russian Ballet, which toured in Rome; during this time he met Olga Khoklova, who was also a ballerina. Picasso and Olga got married in 1918 and returned to Paris. The marriage didn’t last long and they split up in 1935. Olga came from nobility, and an upper-class lifestyle, while Pablo Picasso led a bohemian lifestyle, which caused conflicts. Although the couple separated, they remained officially married, until Olgas death, in 1954 from cancer (https://www.pablopicasso.org/picasso-biography.jsp). In 1961, he married a woman by the name of Jacqueline Roque. They had a very happy marriage until Picasso died. Thirteen years later Jacqueline still mourned the loss of her husband and killed herself in 1986. One of Picasso’s most famous artworks were from the Cubism Period. In cubism, the artist breaks up his elements of his subject and dissects or analyzes them (Greenfield, 93). Pablo Picasso moved toward abstraction, leaving minimal recogn izable objects of the real world while providing the artists interpretation of the subject within the frame. The pioneers of this technique were Kandinsky, Mondrian, and Picasso, but used his own geometric style in his work. Picasso didnt so much facet natural objects but used the geometry of Braques paintings to create a style that was abstract in essence (https://www.biography.com/people/pablo-picasso-9440021). A difference between Picasso and another famous artist that was into cubism, Piet Mondrian, was that Picasso didn’t give up on the third dimension. A time period Picasso worked in was the 1940s. During this time WWII was going on. That meant things in France were very limited. Picasso worked with anything at hand, including pieces of wood, bones, wine–bottle caps, scraps of paper, cigarette packets and even a bicycle saddle and handlebars that he used to create a lifelike head of a bull. When canvas was not available he painted on planks and hardboard, or as can be seen in Head of a woman, November 1941, on newspaper where the stark, black outlines seem to echo the austerity and bleakness of war-torn Paris(https://www.ngv.vic.gov.au/picasso/education/ed_JTE_TWY.html). Paris, France was only one a few of the places Picasso worked in. As a boy, we know he worked in Malaga, Spain, where he was born and was introduced to art through his parents. Picasso had his first exhibi t at the age of 13 and later quit art school so that he could experiment full-time with modern art style (https://www.history.co.uk/this-day-in-history/25-october/pablo-picasso-is-born-in-malaga-spain). The college that Picasso attended was Real Academia de Bellas Artes de San Fernando in Barcelona. Barcelona had a profound effect on the teenage artist. The bustling industrialist Catalan capital was in a period of huge growth, embracing progressive ideas about art and society as it raced towards the 20th century. The always prolific artist created thousands of sketches and paintings with the city as his muse (https://www.barcelona-life.com/barcelona/picasso). Picasso spent most of his life in France where he discovered his Blue Period, Rose Period, and his Cubism Period. Picasso had met both of is wives here, created many paintings, and also died here. He died in Mougins, France on April 8, 1973, from congestive heart failure. Even though Picasso isn’t alive his paintings still live to tell the tale. Some of Picasso’s biggest pieces of art were Jacqueline with Flowers, The Blue Room, Child with a Dove, and Portrait of Dora Maar. In the painting, Jacqueline with Flowers Picasso is painting a picture of his second wife, Jaqueline. She’s posing on a chair with her arms crossed with her hair in a bun staring out the window. This shows that she was staring out of a window probably thinking about something. The Blue Room painting shows a woman standing in tub washing. It shows that she’s in her room bathing, so we think that she may live in a small apartment. This picture was painted during the Blue Period. We know this because the picture is filled with different shades of mainly just blue and green. The Child with a Dove is a painting that visualizes a young girl in a white dress holding a dove against her chest. And it shows only the girl, a ball on her left, and only grass and sky in the background, and the dove. The Portrait of Dora Maar shows a woman, Dora Maar, sitting in a seat. She poses with her one hand holding her head. She has short black hair and is wearing a dress. Something Picasso did on purpose was the woman’s eyes. In the painting, he made her left eye red and her right eye green. One of his greatest pieces was 1937s Guernica, painted during WWII. This painting symbolizes pain and sorrow during the war. It shows people, and animals filled with fear. Pabl o Picasso went through different periods (such as the Blue Period, the Rose Period, and the Cubism Period) throughout his career, and he reinvented himself and his artwork in form, style, and subject. Pablo Picasso was one of the most influential artists, whose work is timeless and inspired many other artists.